Secure attachment
Lower anxiety and lower avoidance. Closeness and independence can both feel manageable, and conflict does not automatically threaten the entire bond.
Discover how you tend to connect, communicate, and respond to closeness in relationships.
This educational assessment supports self-reflection and is not a clinical diagnosis or a substitute for professional care.
Finish without sharing your name or email.
Your responses stay in your browser.
See the dimensions behind your result.
Attachment styles are broad patterns in how people seek closeness, respond to uncertainty, and balance connection with independence. The idea grew from attachment theory, but adult relationships are shaped by many influences—including temperament, experience, culture, the current relationship, and stress.
A style is better understood as a tendency than a permanent type. The same person may feel secure in one relationship and more anxious or distant in another. This attachment style quiz focuses on common reactions that can become especially visible when a relationship matters and the outcome feels uncertain.
Use this result as a reflection tool, not a diagnosis or fixed identity.
Your answers point to a broad pattern. The score breakdown adds the context that a single label cannot.
Lower anxiety and lower avoidance. Closeness and independence can both feel manageable, and conflict does not automatically threaten the entire bond.
Higher anxiety and lower avoidance. Connection is highly valued, while ambiguity or distance may trigger worry, monitoring, or a strong need for reassurance.
Lower anxiety and higher avoidance. Independence may feel safer than relying on others, particularly when vulnerability or emotional intensity increases.
Higher anxiety and higher avoidance. Closeness may be strongly desired and simultaneously feel risky, producing shifts between seeking contact and pulling away.
Questions explore reactions to delayed contact, changes in tone, unresolved conflict, reassurance, and the possibility of rejection.
Questions explore comfort with dependence, asking for support, emotional disclosure, staying present in conflict, and balancing intimacy with autonomy.
Scenario-based statements focus on what you are likely to do when closeness or uncertainty activates you, not simply how you describe yourself in the abstract.
Scoring approach
Each answer contributes to either attachment anxiety or attachment avoidance. Some positively worded items are reverse-scored so that agreeing with comfort and trust lowers the corresponding dimension rather than raising it.
Each dimension is averaged and converted to a score from 0 to 100. Scores at or above 55 are described as elevated, creating four broad combinations. The threshold is a transparent rule for this educational assessment—not a clinical cutoff or comparison with a representative population.
Your dimension scores contain more information than the category alone. Two people can receive the same label while differing considerably in intensity, so read the score bars and detailed explanation together.
This original educational assessment is not a validated clinical instrument.
Your closest pattern is the combination of your attachment anxiety and avoidance scores. Lower scores on both tend toward secure; elevated anxiety tends toward anxious/preoccupied; elevated avoidance tends toward avoidant/dismissive; and elevated scores on both tend toward fearful-avoidant.
No. It is an educational self-reflection tool, not a clinical assessment. It cannot evaluate your mental health, personal history, or relationship safety, and it should not replace advice from a qualified professional.
A self-report quiz can organize patterns you recognize, but its result depends on your interpretation of the questions and current context. Use the result as a hypothesis to explore rather than proof of a fixed identity.
Yes. Attachment-related responses can shift with new experiences, safer relationships, intentional practice, therapy, and changing stress levels. They may also vary between relationships.
Many people recognize features of several patterns. The two dimension scores show that variation more clearly than a single label, and your responses may differ across partners, friends, or family relationships.
Anxious patterns tend to intensify efforts to restore connection when it feels uncertain. Avoidant patterns tend to reduce vulnerability or create distance when closeness feels uncomfortable. Some people experience both tendencies.
Fearful-avoidant describes a combination of elevated attachment anxiety and avoidance: closeness may feel important and threatening at the same time. It is a broad pattern, not a statement about why those responses developed.
Answer based on your recurring experience across close relationships when possible. If one relationship is unusually stressful, remember that the result may reflect that context more strongly.
Yes. Retaking after a meaningful period or a change in circumstances may be useful. Repeating it immediately to chase a preferred result is less likely to add insight.
Free · private · 6 minutes
Answer 32 everyday-situation prompts and see your score breakdown immediately.
Start free testNew ways to understand how you think, connect, and make decisions.
Emotional intelligence
Explore patterns in emotional awareness, regulation, empathy, and communication.
Personality
Reflect on the preferences, habits, and perspectives that shape how you approach everyday life.
Career
Explore work preferences, motivating environments, and strengths that may inform your next career move.
Relationships
Compare communication preferences, expectations, and everyday approaches to partnership.
Personality
Explore five broad personality dimensions and how they may show up in daily life.